Universidade do MinhoEscola de Direito    
 
  Universidade do Minho
http://www.cedu.direito.uminho.pt
 
print   close
 
back 
  
Case Ascafor and Asidac - Free movement of goods
 
Judgment
Case C-484/10


Decision:

"On those grounds, the Court (Fifth Chamber) hereby rules:

Articles 34 TFEU and 36 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that the requirements laid down in Article 81 of the structural concrete regulations (EHE-08) approved by Royal Decree No 1247/2008 of 18 July 2008, read in conjunction with Annex 19 to those regulations, for official recognition of certificates demonstrating the quality level of reinforcing steel for concrete granted in a Member State other than the Kingdom of Spain constitute a restriction on the free movement of goods. Such a restriction may be justified by the objective of the protection of human life and health, provided the requirements laid down are not higher than the minimum standards required for the use of reinforcing steel for concrete in Spain. In such a case, it is for the referring court to ascertain ? where the entity granting the certificate of quality which must be officially recognised in Spain is an approved body within the meaning of Council Directive 89/106/EEC of 21 December 1988 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to construction products, as amended by Council Directive 93/68/EEC of 22 July 1993 ? which of those requirement go beyond what is necessary for the purposes of attaining the objective of the protection of human life and health."



 
back 
  © 2020, Universidade do Minho